This thread looks to be a little on the old side and therefore may no longer be relevant. Please see if there is a newer thread on the subject and ensure you're using the most recent build of any software if your question regards a particular product.
This thread has been locked and is no longer accepting new posts, if you have a question regarding this topic please email us at support@mindscape.co.nz
|
Hi, I'm sure that you are aware of the several issues with your forum software. - It is really difficult to search for previous topics, especially by product (i.e. searching is global). It could be that we have all been spoilt by the quality that is Stackoverflow. The support provided is absolutely first-class, however unfortunately the issues that we have to put up with to get that support is not. Is there any plans afoot to fix these critical issues?
|
|
|
Hi Dennis, Plans are afoot. Currently the forums are the worst part of our website and hark back to using Community Server many years ago (every other aspect of the site has replaced CS, just not the forums... yet). I'll update this thread as we start having something concrete to share. John-Daniel Trask |
|
|
Hi Dennis, We have just released an updated version of our forums taking into account everything you fed back.
There's also a bunch of other improvements such as just being cleaner, faster and improved ability to add attachments (you can drag and drop them as well as choosing the upload a file button). I appreciate any further feedback you have. There will be gremlins in the system initially so do sing out if you find any problems. Thanks! John-Daniel Trask |
|
|
Good to hear JD. I haven't needed to post any questions in a while (busy with getting a release done), however I do have a backlog of fixes/bugs that I will submit soon. Feedback |
|
|
Hi Dennis, Thanks for the feedback. We've added the visual improvements to the code view as you suggested. No details on how markdown works yet, but we'll get that up soon. Cheers, JD |
|
|
Are returned search results still in some random order, rather than reverse date order? What is the use in being pointed to out-dated information? [Note: the topic I'm replying to is not the "thanks for the feedback" one, but the announcement post. Some problem with the "reply" forum functionality.] |
|
|
Hi Alex, Thanks for the feedback. At present the search uses Lucene's built in ranking mechanism which does not account for fresher information. We've seen some ways of adding the ability to weight newer items more strongly but haven't added it yet. What we'll likely do is add an option to just sort by date rather than rank. The replying to is pretty naive at the moment - it just grabs the last post in the thread since it's not really a threaded forum. We'll likely just remove the 'reply' from every post as it does confuse things. Appreciate the feedback, we'll make an update this coming week and I'll update this thread when it's done! John-Daniel |
|
|
Perfect! Many thanks for adding that. |
|
|
Hi Alex, Just as an update, we deployed an enhancement last week that adds the ability to sort by date. Thanks, John-Daniel |
|